Stanley Cavell: Skepticism, Subjectivity, and the Ordinary
March 2002, Polity
The book traces the many lines of skepticism occurring in
Cavell's work and shows how they amount to a rich and subtle
picture of human subjectivity. Hammer explores Cavell's passionate
engagement with Austin and Wittgenstein's visions of language, and
his uncovering of conceptions of the ordinary in Emerson and
Thoreau. Central sections of the book are devoted to the tragic and
the comic as these modes of existence come into play in Shakespeare
and Hollywood cinematic drama. In elaborating Cavell's responses to
thinkers such as Heidegger, Levinas, and Derrida, the author
situates Cavell's writing within the wider context of contemporary
Hammer clearly reveals the existential dimensions of Cavell's
thought. He argues that his variant of ordinary language philosophy
is a vital stimulus to self-transformation in cognitive, aesthetic,
ethical, and political domains, contributing significantly to a
rethinking of issues such as responsibility and autonomy, and the
relationship between philosophy and literature.
A critical introduction to the thought of an inordinately complex writer, this book will be of great interest to students and scholars in philosophy, literary theory, cultural theory, comparative literature, and media and cultural studies.
Chapter 1 Ordinary Language Philosophy.
Chapter 2 Skepticism: Criteria and the External World.
Chapter 3 The Other.
Chapter 4 Art and Aesthetics.
Chapter 5 Ethics and Politics.
Chapter 6 Between Philosophy and Literature: Deconstruction and Romanticism.
- A lucid and comprehensive introduction to the work of leading American philosopher, Stanley Cavell
- Examines Cavell's distinctive contribution to philosophy, literary theory, film studies and politics
- Situates Cavell's writing within the wider context of contemporary continental philosophy.
- Shows that Cavell's work is rooted in a subtle and distinctive view of human subjectivity
‘Epsen Hammer’s lucid and engaging account of Cavell’s inheritance of Austin and Wittgenstein is particularly successful in showing how it might make possible genuinely productive encounters between the “analytic” and the “Continental” philosophical traditions.’ – Stephen Mulhall, New College, University of Oxford