LEARNING OBJECTIVES
Ozone depletion in the stratosphere is now
recognized as a major environmental problem with potential catastrophic
effects. This section should foster your understanding of the material
covered in the book regarding the following:
- How chemical and physical processes and reactions link emissions
of chlorofluorocarbons to stratospheric ozone depletion;
- What options are available to minimize ozone depletion;
- Issues surrounding the debate about the primary source of ozone
depleting chemicals (natural vs. man-made chemicals.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE - Are Natural or Man-Made
Chemicals Causing the Ozone Hole?
By 1993 scientists had accumulated
enough evidence to support earlier predictions that stratospheric ozone
was being depleted over the Antarctic. Most of them blamed the damage
on organic chlorine compounds (those containing both carbon and chlorine)
manufactured by humans, such as CFCs. But consensus among most of
the scientists in the filed did not prevent a continuing storm of controversy
over these findings. Critics from a variety of professions charged
that natural sources of chlorine, not those generated by humans, were responsible
for ozone depletion and that the environmental and health threats of ozone
depletion were greatly exaggerated. Although scientific uncertainties
about the cause of the ozone hole were and are still cited, continuing research
has added to the evidence that man-made chemicals and other pollutants are
a direct contributor to ozone depletion.
FAQs
.
Photo Credit: EPA Office of Air and Radiation*
(This is a graphic that represents total ozone
levels above the Antarctic and high latitudes during the Fall of 1995. Although
it is not visible on August 1, the Antarctic
ozone hole is the red and purple area that appears
near the center around September 15. It is defined as having less than 220
dobson units (DU) of ozone in the overhead
column). |