The current population represents something unprecedented
in the history of the world. Never before has one species had such
a great impact on the environment in such a short time and continued to
increase at as rapid a rate. These qualities make the human
population issue the environmental issue. This section should
foster your understanding of concepts covered in the text relating to the
population problem and the issues that are relevant to achieving a constant
world population. Among these issues is the following question: How
can environmental science be used to reduce population growth while taking
into consideration the widely divergent views from one country to another
on human rights, values relating to birth control and reproduction and
ethics.
A CLOSER LOOK
- The Prophecy of Malthus.
Almost two hundred years ago the
English economist Thomas Malthus eloquently stated the human population
problem. He based his argument on the following premises: food is
necessary for survival; children will continue to be born, and; the power
of population growth is "indefinitely greater than the power of the Earth
to produce subsistence." Malthus's projections of the ultimate fate
of humankind were dire, including "gigantic famine" on a global scale.
To this day critics of Malthus point out that his predictions have not
come true because technology has provided a way out, allowing us to live
in greater densities. These critics have argued that our technologies
will continue to save us from a Malthusian fate and that therefore we need
not worry about the growth of the human population.
Who is correct? Although Malthus may have been
wrong about the timing, in a finite world he must be correct about the
ultimate outcome of unchecked growth. How can we achieve a constant
world population, or at least halt the increase in the population, in a
way that is most beneficial to most people? The answer must be based on
the application of sound environmental science coupled with arguments about
rights, values, and ethics within a global perspective.