Skip to main content

Who Owns You?: The Corporate Gold Rush to Patent Your Genes

Who Owns You?: The Corporate Gold Rush to Patent Your Genes

David Koepsell

ISBN: 978-1-405-18730-5

Feb 2009, Wiley-Blackwell

200 pages

Product not available for purchase

Description

Who Owns You? is a comprehensive exploration of the numerous philosophical and legal problems of gene patenting.
  • Provides the first comprehensive book-length treatment of this subject
  • Develops arguments regarding moral realism, and provides a method of judgment that attempts to be ideologically neutral
  • Calls for public attention and policy changes to end the practice of gene patenting
Acknowledgements ix

Introduction 1

1 Individual and Collective Rights in Genomic Data: Preliminary Issues 20

2 Ethics and Ontology: A Brief Discourse on Method 40

3 The Science: Genes and Phenotypes 49

4 DNA, Species, Individuals, and Persons 66

5 Legal Dimensions in Gene Ownership 83

6 Are Genes Intellectual Property? 101

7 DNA and The Commons 119

8 Pragmatic Considerations of Gene Ownership 137

9 So, Who Owns You?: Some Conclusions about Genes, Property, and Personhood 155

Notes 171

Index 181

"This book is a useful exposition of the difficulties that patents on human genes give rise to. Its focus on philosophical considerations adds depth to the debate, and it takes a novel perspective ... A book that proposes that the model should be abolished should promote useful debate in the field." (Journal of Biosocial Science, 2011)

"This is an excellent introductory book to the main topics and concepts related to gene patents. Moreover, not only it is a (well written and) comprehensive piece of writing, but also, it has already had an impact within the academia (see, for instance, the many times that it has been reviewed) probably, because of the relevance of, and the accuracy by which the research topic is addressed, and, also probably, because of its strong (provocative and) normative tone and content." (Asian Biotechnology & Development Review, 1 March 2011)

"Who owns you is lucidly written and reads as a 101 gene patenting. It is a book suitable for all who wish to understand gene patenting, and obtain a fresh perspective on associated ethical and legal matters". (Ethical Perspectives, 1 March 2010)

"Koepsell's timely book is highly recommended for all reading levels." (CHOICE, December 2009)"The writing of Koepsell is expertly critical and thoughtfully opinionated. The vast array of intellectually provocative questions raised directly, or indirectly, by the discerning commentary of Koepsell is a great strength of the book. The book's edifying substance is highly relevant to universities and corporations, importantly including insurance, biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. The rich wealth of information mined by Koepsell's intellectual toil likewise should be of greatly appealing interest to many professionals, including: geneticists, biologists, biomedical scientists, intellectual property scholars, patent public interest and healthcare lawyers, judges, legislators, bioethicists, genetic counselors, and health policy makers." (Metapsychology, April 2010)

"Koepsell makes an extensive argument that gene patents should be recognized as a social justice and human liberty issue ... .Who Owns You provides a real philosophical foundation to anyone interested in the debate." (yalepatents.org, January 2010)

"Who Owns You? is the first long-form, comprehensive treatment of the implications of gene patenting. As such, it deserves much credit for bringing the debate into the public eye, though it's no template for policy change in itself. Perhaps most important is its application of philosophical analysis to bio-policy, an underutilized approach critical to scientific advancement. Koepsell's book serves as a worthy starting point for anyone interested in interconnecting genetics, property law, and philosophy." (Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, December 2009)

  • Provides the first comprehensive book-length treatment covering the philosophical and legal problems of gene patenting
  • Develops arguments regarding moral realism, and provides a method of judgment that attempts to be ideologically neutral
  • Calls for public attention and policy changes to end the practice of gene patenting