Map 1 Distribution of preserved calendars (or calendar fragments) of the fasti type from the first century BCE to the fifth century CE.
Table 1 List of known copies of fasti.
1 Time’s social dimension.
2 Observations on the Roman fasti.
2.1 A Republican version.
2.2 Forms and functions.
2.3 The fasti and the birth of Augustan epigraphy.
2.4 The question of the archetype.
3 Towards an early history of the Roman calendar.
3.1 Notions of a prehistoric calendar.
3.2 The structure of the month.
3.3 Market cycles.
3.4 Modes of dating.
4 The introduction of the Republican calendar.
4.1 Timing and motivation.
4.2 The character and significance of the reform.
5 The written calendar.
5.1 Gnaeus Flavius.
5.2 NP days and feast-names.
5.3 Cultic and linguistic details.
5.4 The purpose of the fasti.
5.5 The law of Hortensius.
5.6 Implications for the historiography of Roman religion.
5.7 Variants on stone and paper.
6 The Acilian law and the problem of pontifical intercalation.
6.1 The nature of the measures.
6.2 How to intercalate in a ritually correct manner?
6.3 Problems of intercalation.
6.4 Regulating intercalation by means of laws.
7 Reinterpretation of the fasti in the temple of the Muses.
7.1 Marcus Fulvius Nobilior, triumphator.
7.2 Temple dedications in the fasti.
7.4 All fasti are Fulvian fasti.
8 From Republic to Empire.
8.1 Caesar's reform of the calendar.
8.2 The calendar as collective memory.
8.3 Augustus and the power of dates.
8.4 The calendar as Roman breviary.
9 The disappearance of marble calendars.
10 Calendar monopoly and competition between calendars.
10.1 One calendar.
10.2 Coexisting and competing developments.
10.4 The calculation of Easter.
10.5 Weekly cycles.
10.6 Fasti christiani?
11 The calendar in the public realm.
“This book is a very welcome addition to the study of Roman time. R. has long stood in the top tier of scholars working on the Roman calendar. This book is destined to become an indispensable resource for scholars and students wishing to understand the origins and development of the Roman calendar as a mechanism for marking time, but more particularly as a social construct at the mercy of the political powers of the time.” (Journal of Roman Studies, 1 August 2013)