Can Emerging Technologies Bridge the Peer Review Gap?

June 21, 2017 Anna Ehler

We sat down with Chris Graf, Wiley’s new Director of Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics, to learn just how much published research needs a second look.

Listen to the previous episode: “Peer Review is Broken” (Or is it?)

You can listen to this episode and others – including strategies to help protect research integrity and how to get the most out of your member surveys – by going to iTunes and subscribing to the Wiley Society Podcast.

References from the episode:

  1. Daniele Fanelli, Meta-assessment of bias in science: http://www.pnas.org/content/114/14/3714.abstract
  2. http://www.pnas.org/content/114/14/3714.abstractHow the Biggest Fabricator in Science Got Caught: http://nautil.us/issue/24/error/how-the-biggest-fabricator-in-science-got-caught
  3. Resis: https://www.resis-srl.com
  4. The EQUATOR Network: http://www.equator-network.org/
  5. Penelope Research: http://www.peneloperesearch.com/
  6. CONSORT Guidelines: http://www.consort-statement.org/
  7. Stat Reviewer: http://www.statreviewer.com/

About the Author

Anna Ehler

Society Marketing Manager, Wiley //

More Content by Anna Ehler
Previous Article
How to Connect Researchers With Journalists for Better Science Communication
How to Connect Researchers With Journalists for Better Science Communication

At IASP's 17th World Congress on Pain, researchers, communication professionals, and journalists met to dis...

Next Article
Evolving with the Transforming Research Landscape at this year's Melbourne Executive Seminar
Evolving with the Transforming Research Landscape at this year's Melbourne Executive Seminar

Learn what issues are top of mind for society publishing professionals in Australia.